Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Otesanya David April 3, 2022

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

[ad_1]

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who receive transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have a higher risk for atrial fibrillation (AF), cardiac arrest, stroke, and redo-TAVR or redo-surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) compared with those without OSA. These findings were presented at the American College of Cardiology 71st Annual Scientific Session & Expo, from April 2nd through 4th, in Washington, DC.

A retrospective cohort study was conducted with the use of TriNetX, a national federated real-time database that contains 69 million records. Although short-term outcomes among patients receiving TAVR have been studied, data on long-term outcomes are sparse. The researchers sought to evaluate 3-year complications in patients with OSA who receive TAVR. All patient cohorts were identified if they met OSA criteria and had undergone a TAVR procedure up until October 1, 2018, in order to meet the 3-year follow-up.

A 1:1 matched propensity score analysis was carried out, with adjustments made for patient comorbidities and demographics, in order to calculate adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) with 95% CIs for any complications of interest. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compute survival probability in 3 years among the 2 cohorts.


Continue Reading

A total of 2182 participants were enrolled in each study arm. The study arms were patients with OSA and patients without OSA (control arm) who received TAVR. Individuals with OSA had a significantly greater risk for AF (aRR, 1.339; 95% CI, 1.251-1.433), cardiac arrest (aRR, 1.554; 95% CI, 1.144-2.110), stroke (aRR, 1.403; 95% CI, 1.155-1.704), and redo-TAVR or SAVR (aRR, 1.430; 95% CI, 1.134-1.803) compared with those without OSA.

No statistically significant differences were reported between the 2 cohorts in other long-term complications that were evaluated, which included mortality (aRR, 1.045; 95% CI, 0.931-1.172) and pacemaker placement (aRR, 1.170; 95% CI, 0.973 -1.406).

Further, Kaplan-Meier analysis for mortality did not achieve a statistically significant difference in 3-year survival probability in the OSA group vs the control group (hazard ratio, 0.957; 95% CI, 0.841-1.089; P =.5025).

“Additional research is needed to visit further longer-term impacts in patients with [OSA],” the researchers wrote.

Disclosure: None of the study authors have declared affiliations with biotech, pharmaceutical, and/or device companies.  

Reference

Raiker R. Examining 3-year outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Presented at: American College of Cardiology 71st Annual Scientific Session & Expo; April 2-4, 2022; Washington, DC.

This article originally appeared on The Cardiology Advisor

[ad_2]

Source link

Write a comment